Wednesday, June 9, 2010

here a dry cleaner, there a dry cleaner

The building at 1821 First Street NW looks like it's almost complete, which likely triggered the following petition from ANC 5C 04 commissioner John Salatti:
Although we definitely appreciate the owners’ efforts to rehabilitate a long-vacant building and put it back into useful service, we do not support the opening of a second dry cleaning establishment. This area needs a variety of services that we do not have currently and which we as neighbors would support heartily. These services include sit-down, full-service restaurants, boutiques, stationery and card stores, consignment shops, electronics stores, child-care centers, hardware stores, bakeries, delicatessens, diners, pet grooming establishment, vet clinic, bank, etc. These are businesses that we want, that we need, and that we will patronize. We are not likely to patronize another dry cleaning establishment.
As of this writing, there are now 101 signatures, though since none are publicly visible, it's hard to say how many neighborhood residents actually signed it.  The Housing Complex piece likely drew signatures from outside the community as well, and maybe there will be a few more due to this post.  I can understand that folks are disappointed about getting another dry cleaner when there's City Cleaners just a block away, but this is something that could likely have been addressed by the community when the sale of the building went through, or even earlier, when the for-sale signs went up.  It could have happened even as late as March of this year, which is when the business permits were approved.

I'll admit to slacking off on this personally.  I actually started to draft a post that was focused on the environmental impacts that a dry cleaner would have on the property a couple of months ago: namely, the fact that if the building were ever to be reused for another purpose, it would have to undergo remediation to remove the chemicals used in the dry-cleaning process from the site.  Since that would be a pretty expensive undertaking, once a property is used as a location for a dry cleaner, it generally stays that way.  

That said, I do have to wonder exactly what the petition is meant to achieve.  Online petitions are easy to set up and don't require the time and effort of someone going door-to-door to talk to their neighbors in person, but I think the ease of use comes with a cost.  There's something effective about handing over a sheaf of papers with the signatures and addresses of those who live in the neighborhood, and a printout of a Web page seems sterile in comparison to pages scrawled over with ink.  Will a petition—of any variety—change the owners' plans for 1821 First Street NW?  Probably not, but hopefully it's made the signatories take notice of the goings-on in Bloomingdale.

11 comments:

IMGoph said...

i agree with the sentiment that bloomingdale probably doesn't need another dry cleaner, but hey, for all the people who like to point out that bars and restaurants should be able to open in the area, it's equally easy to say that this owner should have the right to do what they want with their building as well.

free enterprise and what not...

Lifeontheedgewood said...

I agree I am not sure what is the point of the petition. If someone wants to come into the neighborhood and fix up a building and open a business investing in the community then they should be able to decide what kind of business they want to open. I mean it is a drycleaner which is not a business that I would think that would take away from the neighborhood. While it maybe a redundant use there are still plenty of empty spaces for other businesses and the owner has a right to choose how to spend his money.

If people don't like it they don't have to use it just like I don't use the corner liquor stores in my neighborhood.

C.J. said...

I guess my worry is that it does not behoove Bloomingdale to have a business come in and set up shop only to go under in a few years due to the redundancy of having another dry cleaners a block away. The result would be having the building vacant yet again, albeit in a significantly improved state.

I am not against new, small businesses coming in at all. I just want whatever goes into that spot, be it a dry cleaner or whatever, to have the best shot at success. Maybe this has all been thought about and planned by the owners and my worry is baseless...I hope.

Anonymous said...

The owner should have the right to do what he wants with the building. Bloomingdale should be happy Mr. Choe wants to do contribute a new business in the neighborhood!

AP said...

Regarding the author's comments on the environmental impacts of the dry cleaners, the majority of small, neighborhood dry cleaning businesses are "drop-off" locations, meaning that the actual cleaning/chemical-use is done at another location off-site. Do you know if this is the case for this particular property? The property seems too small to host a full-service dry cleaning operation. If this is simply a drop-off location, it will be very easy for another retailer to come in and reuse the space without any environmental issues.

Anonymous said...

I find it interesting that Mr. Choe has not responded to these comments. He does not have to respond. However, soon he will be operating a retail establishment in the Bloomingdale area. Business owners should at least acknowledge that they are aware of the concerns of people living in the area. People living in the area must recognize that it is Mr. Choe's business. Whether there is enough business to support two profitable dry cleaning businesses, only time will tell. Finally, while it is ok for people to give suggestions, we all must respect Mr. Choe's rights to operate a business.

1500 B/O first said...

Someone new to the neighborhood should know where all the local blogs (how many now, 4,5?) are and monitor them religiously so that he can respond to someone venting w/in 24hrs. More to the point, why hasn't Salatti approached the owner? That's his job, right?

IMGoph said...

1500 b/o first: no, it's not john salatti's job, because that's not his SMD—it's stu's.

mel said...

3:52,

I am not aware of any business owners commenting on any of our neighborhood blogs, except for the owners of big bear. most owners simply don't care.

jbr said...

heres the thing, if 2 or 3 bars ever open up in this area, no one is going to care about another dry cleaner. or whatever else opens. it could be another church and few would care.

IMGoph said...

jbr: sigh...that's a big "if"... :(

Post a Comment

Comment upon others as you would have them comment upon you.